Well I also changed my mind, disciples today aren't any particular type of way, 🤫. Maybe some disciples current or previous want to 👀 things, and some don't, and that's just how it goes.
And I don't know if it's wrong for you to be worried about it! I was busy thinking about the indignity, I didn't get time to question the safety. Lan Zhan would probably say it isn't wrong though regardless. Commendable, even. "Don't take unnecessary risks" sounds like a rule. Not wanting to be responsible for people getting hurt, too. ☁️👍 for those probably. Though I don't think you'd be responsible, all you did was talk about it. Anyway, won't they have counted for that? It's specifically for people who aren't very good. Maybe they give you some 🐎 strategies for free.
...Which disciples want to 👀 things? If I'm the kind that doesn't, then who is the other kind? Is it you? Did a 🤏👻 want to 👀 things?
"Don't take unnecessary risks" does sound like a rule. Maybe I've heard it before... or maybe something like it. A 👻 should know all the rules, right? From writing them so many times?
I don't see how I wouldn't be responsible, though. ☁️ also said not to encourage dangerous things, and wasn't that encouraging?? ...But if they've thought about the safety part here, then maybe it'll be okay. 👿🤔😕😕😕 ...I'm only 64% certain that they've thought about it, though. They give us dangerous things to do all the time, don't they? I think they have a bad idea of what dangerous means here. Their 🐎 strategies might just be "Don't fall off".
Maybe a 🤏👻 would not have said no to 👀 some things. IF they were really funny. Maybe this explains some things about how I am being treated in my old age.
A 👻 does know all the rules, but a 👿 doesn't, and as long as that's true anything can sound like a rule.
These specific percents are so scary. Why does the sand cultivator calculate things like a trusted wartime advisor to a general. 64% seems pretty good though. I'd take it. And that's why you wouldn't be responsible.
...I don't see how a 🤏👻 is any different from a 👻 now. Besides, I think a 👻 is treated really well! Lots of snacks and at least 6 different roofs to lay on. Is there anything else a 👻 needs??
...When you say it like that, I feel like I need to check with ☁️ about what the ☁️ rules actually are. "You can say anything and no one will know" is definitely a 👻 rule.
Maybe I am a trusted wartime advisor! You can be the general. So it's my job and responsibility to inform you that 64% is not a high enough percent. Don't take that. We need more information about how rigorous the safety measures are.
Ghosts are trusted! You already have that! Just not about rules that they've made up in the past. Maybe you're the one doing the bullying. Am I not allowed to bully a little? At all? 👿🥺
Fine, maybe I will ask ☁️ for more rules then. Maybe I'll learn the rules that you didn't! We can compare notes. 📜✅❌ Then I'll make up some more that you two can compare. We'll have ☁️ rules, 👻 rules, and 😈 rules~
😈🤝👻! No 🛡️🐎🗡️ without further reconnaissance. I can agree to that. We can go 👀 and if the safety is bad, then there's at least still snacks~
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
(no subject)
Date: 2022-08-27 03:08 am (UTC)And I don't know if it's wrong for you to be worried about it! I was busy thinking about the indignity, I didn't get time to question the safety. Lan Zhan would probably say it isn't wrong though regardless. Commendable, even. "Don't take unnecessary risks" sounds like a rule. Not wanting to be responsible for people getting hurt, too. ☁️👍 for those probably. Though I don't think you'd be responsible, all you did was talk about it. Anyway, won't they have counted for that? It's specifically for people who aren't very good. Maybe they give you some 🐎 strategies for free.
(no subject)
Date: 2022-08-27 04:24 am (UTC)"Don't take unnecessary risks" does sound like a rule. Maybe I've heard it before... or maybe something like it. A 👻 should know all the rules, right? From writing them so many times?
I don't see how I wouldn't be responsible, though. ☁️ also said not to encourage dangerous things, and wasn't that encouraging?? ...But if they've thought about the safety part here, then maybe it'll be okay. 👿🤔😕😕😕 ...I'm only 64% certain that they've thought about it, though. They give us dangerous things to do all the time, don't they? I think they have a bad idea of what dangerous means here. Their 🐎 strategies might just be "Don't fall off".
(no subject)
Date: 2022-08-27 05:41 pm (UTC)A 👻 does know all the rules, but a 👿 doesn't, and as long as that's true anything can sound like a rule.
These specific percents are so scary. Why does the sand cultivator calculate things like a trusted wartime advisor to a general. 64% seems pretty good though. I'd take it. And that's why you wouldn't be responsible.
(no subject)
Date: 2022-08-27 06:41 pm (UTC)...When you say it like that, I feel like I need to check with ☁️ about what the ☁️ rules actually are. "You can say anything and no one will know" is definitely a 👻 rule.
Maybe I am a trusted wartime advisor! You can be the general. So it's my job and responsibility to inform you that 64% is not a high enough percent. Don't take that. We need more information about how rigorous the safety measures are.
(no subject)
Date: 2022-08-27 07:58 pm (UTC)It definitely is! I can't just tell you all the rules, that's ☁️'s job. He would be bored.
I don't dare, I don't dare. But I will accept this advisement, and will not 🛡️🐎🗡️ without further reconnaissance.
(no subject)
Date: 2022-08-28 12:18 am (UTC)Fine, maybe I will ask ☁️ for more rules then. Maybe I'll learn the rules that you didn't! We can compare notes. 📜✅❌ Then I'll make up some more that you two can compare. We'll have ☁️ rules, 👻 rules, and 😈 rules~
😈🤝👻! No 🛡️🐎🗡️ without further reconnaissance. I can agree to that. We can go 👀 and if the safety is bad, then there's at least still snacks~